Search
Monero’s 51% Attack Problem: Inside Qubic’s Controversial Network Takeover
12.8.2025
Qubic says it has achieved hashrate dominance over Monero, sparking concerns over the future of the network's decentralization
Monero network turmoil as Qubic claims hashrate dominance
12.8.2025
Qubic claims it has achieved 51% control of Monero’s hashrate, prompting debate over whether the resulting six-block reorganization was a successful attack
Monero network turmoil as Qubic claims hashrate dominance
12.8.2025
Qubic claims it has achieved 51% control of Monero’s hashrate, prompting debate over whether the resulting six-block reorganization was a successful attack
Monero network turmoil as Qubic claims hashrate dominance
12.8.2025
Qubic claims it has achieved 51% control of Monero’s hashrate, prompting debate over whether the resulting six-block reorganization was a successful attack
Monero network turmoil as Qubic claims hashrate dominance
12.8.2025
Qubic claims it has achieved 51% control of Monero’s hashrate, prompting debate over whether the resulting six-block reorganization was a successful attack
Monero network turmoil as Qubic claims hashrate dominance
12.8.2025
Qubic claims it has achieved 51% control of Monero’s hashrate, prompting debate over whether the resulting six-block reorganization was a successful attack
Monero network turmoil as Qubic claims hashrate dominance
12.8.2025
Qubic claims it has achieved 51% control of Monero’s hashrate, prompting debate over whether the resulting six-block reorganization was a successful attack
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining
US accounts for over 40% of global Bitcoin hashrate: Report
3.1.2025
Hashrate dominance continues to be debated due to the pseudonymous and geographically distributed nature of Bitcoin mining